Its been clear to me, after living in a variety of socialist countries, that immigration has always been a political tool to engineer a social order the left can control and leverage for permanent political advantage. In Canada they even have a word for it--"natural governing party", which is ironic, because there is nothing natural about it. In western country after western country, the left has "imported" voters to undermine the democratic rights of its citizens to control their own destiny. Clearly the socialists all get together at international conspiracy parties to discuss tactics, because its a clear pattern all over Europe, Canada, Australia and now the U.S.A., but it rare to have one of their number admit it outright.
Leaks which showed how Labour intentionally flooded Britain with immigrants in order to gain a permanent political majority and rub multiculturalism in the faces of poor whites has provoked a storm of outrage in the UK. It plays directly into the BNP narrative of invasion abetted by leftist treason. The Telegraph reported that “Labour threw open Britain’s borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a ‘truly multicultural’ country, a former Government adviser has revealed.” But it was manner in which the plan was sugar-coated which rankled the most. It was, if the leaks are to be believed, an ideological conspiracy sold as a plan to bolster the economy. It’s almost as if the Left set out to paint itself in the very same colors the BNP wanted it to done.
The BNP is essentially the British version of Le Front National in France (Jean-Marie Le Pen's party), which itself is a clone of any number of European fascist parties--all of which arose as backlash against socialist immigration policies.
It all sounds so familiar, doesn't it?
Comments (1)
The BNP is a 'far-right', meaning 'far-left', socialist party which is racist in that it wants the UK to be for indigenous whites, whatever that means we are. It's pragmatically moving to a position of banning non-white immigration and opposing Islamism. That resonates strongly across a society which has been swindled by all the main parties. The BNP leader, Nick Griffin, was allowed to appear last week on the BBC's flagship current affairs program, Question Time, which got its highest ever viewing of 8 million. Griffin was ineffectual and shifty, but the format was engineered to put him on the defensive. In particular the audience was left-wing, multicultural, anti-BNP - highly representative of a libtard mental universe, but unrepresentative of the real UK which is 92% white. The instant meme of BNP failure was reversed in 48 hours to a meme of the BNP leader getting set up and bullied. The meme is reinforced by a poll which shows that 22% of the electorate would consider voting BNP who were heretofore political pariahs.
The party which would be best positioned to prosper from the new mood is UKIP (UK Independence Party) as it's conservative, anti-Islamist, anti-EU, with no racist tinge, but UKIP needs a charismatic leader. The obvious choice is Dan Hannan, but he's pragmatically cleaving to the Conservative Party (who will form the next government come the May General Election) despite his leader's (Cameron's) unwillingness to grant a referendum on the new EU Constitution should Vaclav Havel, the Czech President, the last hold-out of the 27 nations, finally sign-up. Is all that clear?
The bottom line is that there's a dynamic conservatism in the UK which is bypassing the main parties who are used to controlling it. The future is almost certainly a reaction against the statism of recent decades, but the key issue of EU Membership is still unresolved. We need to get out or get ourselves thrown out.
Posted by mark | October 27, 2009 12:28 PM
Posted on October 27, 2009 12:28